but you can edit your first draft. |
There is very little flare to my shitty
first draft. Aside from those first thousand words that I wrote two
years ago and edited until they were gleaming it is just facts on a
page, with all of the fluency and grace of a seven year old writing
about their school holidays – 'I went swimming then I had a burger then my sister punched me in the leg on the way home so I
broke her toy and we both got in trouble and it wasn't
fair'. I didn't know that I had it in me to write so badly.
The shitty first draft is an notion
that stuck with me after reading Anne Lamott's Bird by Bird five
years ago (and then four years ago and three years ago and one year
ago - I love that book). Inspired by Earnest Hemingway's assertion
that the first draft of everything is shit, its only purpose to get a
writer past the terrifyng hurdle of the blank page to the point where
they can revise it and tweak it and turn it into a good second draft
and an even better third draft, she wrote a whole chapter extolling
the virtues of the Shitty First Draft. It is an explosion of the myth
that coherent words just flow from those with a gift for them, that a
good writer can just write and that if what comes from your hands the
first time around is less than readable then writing is not for you.
She says
I know some
very great writers, writers you love who write beautifully and have
made a great deal of money, and not one of them sits down routinely
feeling wildly enthusiastic and confident. Not one of them writes
elegant first drafts. All right, one of them does, but we do not like
her very much. We do not think that she has a rich inner life or that
God* likes her or can even stand her.
Very few
writers really know what they are doing until they've done it. Nor do
they go about their business feeling dewy and thrilled. They do not
type a few stiff warm-up sentences and then find themselves bounding
along like huskies across the snow.
We all often
feel like we are pulling teeth, even those writers whose prose ends
up being the most natural and fluid. The right words and sentences
just do not come pouring out like ticker tape most of the time. Now,
Muriel Spark is said to have felt that she was taking dictation from
God every morning -- sitting there, one supposes, plugged into a
Dictaphone, typing away, humming. But this is a very hostile and
aggressive position. One might hope for bad things to rain down on a
person like this.
I find myself thinking of this a lot
at the moment, as the words stack up and they are mostly terrible.
Lamott also advises vehemently against editing as one goes, she says
that you must get to the end and then edit. Doing this pains me.
Seeing all of those crappy words sitting there disjointedly and
clumsily and adding yet more crappy words to them makes me feel
slightly sick, but she knows more than me and is very clever and I
need someone to tell me what to do and seeing as she makes me
laugh a lot it may as well be her. Not everyone agrees with her, this guy for instance, but I don't know who he is, he has never made me laugh and he doesn't care for the word 'shitty', so I see no reason to listen to him.
I'm not sure I can do it right until
the end. I am working in six sections and I suspect that once I have
finished the first one I will go back and edit it, partly to see if I
can make it readable before I flog myself over 60,000 more words, and partly because there's only so long I can go
on living with this drivel on my hard drive. What if I die before I
get a chance to edit it and people think that it was meant to
be like this? Sheesh.
* Lamott
writes a lot about God and Christianity and has written some
beautiful books about faith and how she got there from being a raging alcoholic. I am not religious, not with any
regularity or predictability anyway, and I love her writings on God,
they are some of the most calming, reasuring, inspiring, hilarious
books I have ever read. I have reread Travelling Mercies even more times than I've reread Bird by Bird.